Modelling Managerial Determinants for Green Building Technology Adoption: A Decision-Making Framework from the West Bank
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31181/dmame7220241500Keywords:
Green Building Technology (GBT), GBT Adoption, Sustainability, Sustainable Building Practices, Partial Least Squares (PLS), Social AcceptanceAbstract
This research explores the managerial and environmental conditions affecting the uptake of Green Building Technology (GBT) in the West Bank, based on data collected from 500 real estate developers. The analysis employed Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modelling (PLS-SEM) to evaluate the proposed framework. The results demonstrate that governmental support, the perceived benefits of GBT, acceptance within the market, and societal pressures all significantly and positively influence adoption. Conversely, perceived limitations of GBT show a significant negative impact. Additionally, the presence of internal GBT-related resources within organisations mediates the effect of government support on adoption. Leadership commitment from top management and a strong sense of environmental responsibility were also found to strengthen several of the model’s relationships. The findings emphasise the importance of both institutional backing and internal capacities in driving sustainable building practices, alongside the active participation of key stakeholders. This study enhances the academic discourse on green building and provides practical guidance that may assist policymakers, property developers, and sustainability advocates in promoting GBT implementation within the context of developing nations
Downloads
References
[1] Ahmad, T., Thaheem, M. J., & Anwar, A. (2016). Developing a green-building design approach by selective use of systems and techniques. Architectural Engineering and Design Management, 12(1), 29-50. https://doi.org/10.1080/17452007.2015.1092310
[2] Andelin, M., Sarasoja, A.-L., Ventovuori, T., & Junnila, S. (2015). Breaking the circle of blame for sustainable buildings–evidence from Nordic countries. Journal of corporate real estate, 17(1), 26-45. https://doi.org/10.1108/JCRE-05-2014-0013
[3] Anzagira, L., Duah, D., & Badu, E. (2019). A conceptual framework for the uptake of the green building concept in Ghana. Scientific African, 6, e00191. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sciaf.2019.e00191
[4] Caralis, G., Christakopoulos, T., Karellas, S., & Gao, Z. (2019). Analysis of energy storage systems to exploit wind energy curtailment in Crete. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 103, 122-139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2018.12.017
[5] Chan, A. P., Darko, A., Ameyaw, E. E., & Owusu-Manu, D.-G. (2017). Barriers affecting the adoption of green building technologies. Journal of Management in Engineering, 33(3), 04016057. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000507
[6] Chatterjee, S., Sreen, N., Sadarangani, P. H., & Gogoi, B. J. (2022). Impact of green consumption value, and context-specific reasons on green purchase intentions: A behavioral reasoning theory perspective. Journal of Global Marketing, 35(4), 285-305. https://doi.org/10.1080/08911762.2021.1996670
[7] Chen, L., Gao, X., Hua, C., Gong, S., & Yue, A. (2021). Evolutionary process of promoting green building technologies adoption in China: A perspective of government. Journal of Cleaner Production, 279, 123607. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123607
[8] Darko, A. (2019). Adoption of green building technologies in Ghana: Development of a model of green building technologies and issues influencing their adoption. https://theses.lib.polyu.edu.hk/handle/200/9924
[9] Darko, A. (2019). Adoption of green building technologies in Ghana: Development of a model of green building technologies and issues influencing their adoption The Hong Kong Polytechnic University]. https://theses.lib.polyu.edu.hk/handle/200/9788
[10] Djokoto, S. D., Dadzie, J., & Ohemeng-Ababio, E. (2014). Barriers to sustainable construction in the Ghanaian construction industry: consultants perspectives. Journal of Sustainable Development, 7(1), 134. http://dx.doi.org/10.5539/jsd.v7n1p134
[11] Djokoto, S. D., Dadzie, J., & Ohemeng-Ababio, E. (2014). Barriers to Sustainable Construction in the Ghanaian Construction Industry: Consultants Perspectives. Journal of Sustainable Development, 7(1), 134-143. https://doi.org/10.5539/jsd.v7n1p134
[12] Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of marketing research, 18(1), 39-50. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378101800104
[13] Ganiyu, A.-Y., Adebiyi, R. W. M., Abdulraheem, R. T., Orire, M., Eluwa, I. S., & Stephen, E. (2020). Barrier Factors Affecting Adoption of Green Building Technologies in Nigeria/Ganiyu Amuda-Yusuf…[et al.]. Built Environment Journal (BEJ), 17(2), 37-48. https://ir.uitm.edu.my/id/eprint/41972/
[14] Ge, J., Zhao, Y., Luo, X., & Lin, M. (2020). Study on the suitability of green building technology for affordable housing: A case study on Zhejiang Province, China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 275, 122685. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122685
[15] Grierson, D. (2003). Arcology and Arcosanti: towards a sustainable built environment. Electronic green journal, 1(18). http://doi.org/10.5070/G311810506
[16] Häkkinen, T., & Belloni, K. (2011). Barriers and drivers for sustainable building. Building research & information, 39(3), 239-255. https://doi.org/10.1080/09613218.2011.561948
[17] Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2015). A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of the academy of marketing science, 43, 115-135. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-014-0403-8
[18] Hwang, B.-G., Zhu, L., & Ming, J. T. T. (2017). Factors affecting productivity in green building construction projects: The case of Singapore. Journal of Management in Engineering, 33(3), 04016052. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000499
[19] IEA. (2017). Global Status Report 2017. https://www.worldgbc.org/news-media/global-status-report-2017
[20] Jimenez, M. P., DeVille, N. V., Elliott, E. G., Schiff, J. E., Wilt, G. E., Hart, J. E., & James, P. (2021). Associations between nature exposure and health: a review of the evidence. International journal of environmental research and public health, 18(9), 4790. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18094790
[21] Joyram, H., Govindan, K., & Nunkoo, R. (2022). A comprehensive review on the adoption of insulated block/eco-block as a green building technology from a resident perspective. Cleaner Engineering and Technology, 8, 100480. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clet.2022.100480
[22] Kats, G., Alevantis, L., Berman, A., Mills, E., & Perlman, J. (2003). The costs and financial benefits of green buildings. A report to California’s sustainable building task force, 134. https://www.academia.edu/5217491/
[23] Koebel, C. T., McCoy, A. P., Sanderford, A. R., Franck, C. T., & Keefe, M. J. (2015). Diffusion of green building technologies in new housing construction. Energy and Buildings, 97, 175-185. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2015.03.037
[24] Quangdung, T., Tien Toi, P., Chinh, K., Phuong Nam, T., & Ngoc Thoan, N. (2019). A SWOT analysis of the market of green building technologies in Vietnam. Journal of Science and Technology, 13(2V), 76-85.
[25] Shi, Q., Zuo, J., Huang, R., Huang, J., & Pullen, S. (2013). Identifying the critical factors for green construction–an empirical study in China. Habitat international, 40, 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2013.01.003
[26] Tran, Q., Nazir, S., Nguyen, T.-H., Ho, N.-K., Dinh, T.-H., Nguyen, V.-P., Nguyen, M.-H., Phan, Q.-K., & Kieu, T.-S. (2020). Empirical examination of factors influencing the adoption of green building technologies: The perspective of construction developers in developing economies. Sustainability, 12(19), 8067. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12198067
[27] Twumasi-Ampofo, K., Osei-Tutu, E., Decardi-Nelson, I., & Ofori, P. A. (2014). A Model for Reactivating Abandoned Public Housing Projects in Ghana. https://www.iiste.org/Journals/index.php/CER/article/view/11697
[28] Twumasi-Ampofo, K., Osei–Tutu, E., Decardi-Nelson, I., & Abrokwa, O. P. (2014). A model for reactivating abandoned public housing projects in Ghana. Journal of Civil and Environmental Research, 6(3), 6-16. https://core.ac.uk/reader/234677743
[29] USGB. (2017). Leadership in the Green Community. https://www.usgbc.org/articles/top-10-articles-usgbc-2017
[30] Wang, P., Deng, X., Zhou, H., & Yu, S. (2019). Estimates of the social cost of carbon: A review based on meta-analysis. Journal of Cleaner Production, 209, 1494-1507. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.11.058
[31] Wang, W., Zhang, S., Su, Y., & Deng, X. (2018). Key factors to green building technologies adoption in developing countries: the perspective of Chinese designers. Sustainability, 10(11), 4135. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10114135
[32] Wang, W., Zhang, S., Su, Y., & Deng, X. (2019). An empirical analysis of the factors affecting the adoption and diffusion of GBTS in the construction market. Sustainability, 11(6), 1795. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11061795
[33] Wolfinbarger, M., Hair, J., Page, M., Samouel, P., & Money, A. (2011). Essentials of Business Research Methods. In: Taylor and Francis, Florence. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315704562
[34] Yang, Z., Chen, H., Mi, L., Li, P., & Qi, K. (2021). Green building technologies adoption process in China: how environmental policies are reshaping the decision-making among alliance-based construction enterprises? Sustainable Cities and Society, 73, 103122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2021.103122
[35] Yin, S., Li, B., & Xing, Z. (2019). The governance mechanism of the building material industry (BMI) in transformation to green BMI: The perspective of green building. Science of the Total Environment, 677, 19-33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.04.317
[36] Zhao, D.-X., He, B.-J., Johnson, C., & Mou, B. (2015). Social problems of green buildings: From the humanistic needs to social acceptance. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 51, 1594-1609. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.07.072
[37] Zhussupova, Z., Onyusheva, I., & El-Hodiri, M. (2018). Corporate governance and firm value of Kazakhstani companies in the conditions of economic instability. Polish Journal of Management Studies, 17(2), 235-245. http://dx.doi.org/10.17512/pjms.2018.17.2.20
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Decision Making: Applications in Management and Engineering

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.